|
Tomato
Test in South Africa
Swakopmund, 30th March, 2004
Because we’ve
a big problem with blossom-end-rot in tomatoes (because of very
brackish irrigation water), we decided to take part in a test of
“Monty’s Joy Juice” (what’s in a name ?). A big part of our
harvested tomato harvest can not be sold just because of
blossom-end-rot. So the purpose of the test was to find out
whether Monty’s has a (positive) influence on the amount of
marketable tomatoes. In February/March 2004 we did the test.
The Test
We had 4 rows
planted with young tomato plants, all of them were transplanted on
the same date (12th of January). All were from the same
cultivar.
Average height
at the start of the test was aprox. 20 cm and they then just
started to make their first blossoms. Two out of four rows were
sprayed with Monty’s 8-16-18.The other two rows got a different
foliar application (recommended by a vegetable-seed dealer).
The first
foliar applications of Monty’s started on the 5th of
February. The second foliar application was on the 19th
of February. The third foliar applications was on the 4th
of March.So every 14 days. All the time the concentration of
Monty’s 8-16-18 was a 100 ml on 18 ltrs of water.
From the 18th
of March, two weeks after the third application, the test
population still got Monty’s 8-16-18 but in a different dose, 20
ml per 18 ltrs of water. Again every 14 days.
The 25th
and the 30th of March we picked tomatoes from the two
populations. For each population the good tomatoes without
blossom-end-rot and also the tomatoes which did have
blossom-end-rot were weighted.
Percentage of
good and bad tomatoes (affected by blossom-end-rot) from plants
sprayed with Monty’s and plants sprayed with a different
fertilizer. First harvest at the 25th of March:
|
|
Good
tomatoes |
Blossom-end-rot |
|
Sprayed
with Monty’s |
41,7
|
58,3 |
|
Not
sprayed with Monty’s |
6,4 |
93,6 |
Percentage of
good and bad tomatoes (affected by blossom-end-rot) from plants
sprayed with Monty’s and plants sprayed with a different
fertilizer. Second harvest at the 30th of March:
|
|
Good
tomatoes |
Blossom-end-rot |
|
Sprayed
with Monty’s |
67,8 |
32,2 |
|
Not
sprayed with Monty’s |
27,9 |
72,1 |
Conclusion:
Monty’s has a
considerable positive influence on the percentage of good,
marketable tomatoes. The influence is highest at the first
harvest. At the second harvest one can notice that the control
population catches up but still the percentage of marketable
tomatoes is highest on the plants which are sprayed with Monty’s.
One can expect
that the control population will still improve a lot. Also the
population sprayed with Monty’s will probably show some
improvement at the third harvest (and later).
Earlier,
before this test, we weighted good and bad tomatoes on tomato
plants of the same cultivar which we sprayed with the same foliar
application as the control population of the test.
At the third
harvest these plants produced 82% of good, marketable tomatoes !
So it seems
that the application of Monty’s in the first 10 weeks will be the
most effective.
|